As of 2011, Cars 2 is Pixar's lowest rated film to date, receiving a “rotten” rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a average score of 57 on metacritic, however is it as bad as what people say?
To begin with Cars 2 is the sequel to Cars; a film of which didn't really strike the cords and connections with many people as previous films of Pixar have done. Cars 2, being the sequel has lots of convincing to do; especially if it follows Toy Story 3, a film which is often considered among the best films of 2010.
Cars 2, like Cars, does share the same problem, and that problem is the intended audience. Generally the subject of Cars is more male oriented, and by having a movie about talking Cars and racing, animated as well would easily be enough to narrow the audience down. It isn't a fault of the characters or the story as those aspects were strong to begin with. What is funny is that if these very same characters took form of a human or an animal, the overall reception would differ dramatically.
Now like other Pixar movies, of which feature great story, great animation, and great voice acting to list a few. Cars 2 follows that trend and is no different. These characters featured are loveable, funny and easy to root for. The story is entertaining, paying homages to many spy flicks of the past generations. The animation speaks for itself. And the humour found is plenty, enough to please those of all ages.
But for all the good, there are some negatives for this film. The most notable being that I felt the final third act was rush and poorly put together. But other than that, there was little to fault and complain about.
I saw Cars 2 in 3D and I found it very enjoyable and while it isn't the best Pixar has to offer, it is at least worth a watch.
My Rating
3.5/5